The power consumption of this NAS type is fair, and functions in the NAS can fit most end-user requirements. Embedded system based NAS – Using an ARM or MIPS based processor architecture and a real-time operating system (RTOS) or an embedded operating system to run a NAS server.Max FTP throughput speed varies by computer CPU and amount of RAM. Some large NAS manufacturers like Synology, QNAP, Thecus and Asustor make these types of devices. The power consumption of this NAS type is the largest, but its functions are the most powerful.
Computer based NAS – Using a computer (Server level or a personal computer), installs FTP/SMB/AFP.
The way manufacturers make NAS devices can be classified into three types:
#BEST NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE FOR MAC PC#
Such a 'NAS' SATA hard disk drive can be used as an internal PC hard drive, without any problems or adjustments needed, as it simply supports additional options and may possibly be built to a higher quality standard (particularly if accompanied by a higher quoted MTBF figure and higher price) than a regular consumer drive. If a drive spends several seconds executing extensive retries it might cause the RAID controller to flag the drive as 'down' whereas if it simply replied promptly that the block of data had a checksum error, the RAID controller would use the redundant data on the other drives to correct the error and continue without any problem. In an appropriately configured RAID array, a single bad block on a single drive can be recovered completely via the redundancy encoded across the RAID set. In a non-RAID application, it may be important for a disk drive to go to great lengths to successfully read a problematic storage block, even if it takes several seconds. For example, some NAS versions of drives support a command extension to allow extended error recovery to be disabled. The hard disk drives with 'NAS' in their name are functionally similar to other drives but may have different firmware, vibration tolerance, or power dissipation to make them more suitable for use in RAID arrays, which are often used in NAS implementations. Potential benefits of dedicated network-attached storage, compared to general-purpose servers also serving files, include faster data access, easier administration, and simple configuration. From the mid-1990s, NAS devices began gaining popularity as a convenient method of sharing files among multiple computers. They typically provide access to files using network file sharing protocols such as NFS, SMB, or AFP. Network-attached storage removes the responsibility of file serving from other servers on the network. NAS systems are networked appliances which contain one or more storage drives, often arranged into logical, redundant storage containers or RAID. It is often manufactured as a computer appliance – a purpose-built specialized computer. NAS is specialized for serving files either by its hardware, software, or configuration. Maybe you can't have everything.Network-attached storage ( NAS) is a file-level (as opposed to block-level) computer data storage server connected to a computer network providing data access to a heterogeneous group of clients.
#BEST NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE FOR MAC FOR MAC#
Top of my list at the moment is the Buffalo Linkstation Pro because it has AFP support, which i'm lead to beleive is a plus for Mac users (although i'm not sure why), but the backup software it comes with is for Windows users only. I've looked at the various corporate websites, but they are lacking when it comes to illustrating the 'Mac user experience'. I'm not looking for an overly sophistacated NAS. What i really want is a device that weeks as seemlessly as possible with MacOS, and ideally comes with Mac Software that will allow me to schedule backups. I have a MacBook Pro and i'm running low on disk space.ĭoes anyone have any experiences with the above (or others) and a Mac?įor the vast majority of the time i'm going to be accessing the NAS over a wireless network (I'm going to plug it into my router), so I'm guessing that speed is not really going to be a deciding factor as i'll be limited to speed of my wireless network (54mbps - if i'm lucky!).
0 kommentar(er)
